Showing posts with label blackberry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blackberry. Show all posts
August 10, 2012
December 12, 2010
Michael Mace has a very nice post about what you might call "Peak Customers" (by analogy with Peak Oil).
Time passes, and that middle portion of the market gets consumed. Eventually demand growth starts to drop, and you make another price cut. Sales go up again, sometimes a lot. With revenue rising, you and your investors talk proudly about the benefits of reaching the "mainstream" market.
...
What you don't realize at this point is that you're not "reaching the mainstream," you're actually consuming the late adopters. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to tell when you're selling to the late adopters. They don't wear signs. Companies tend to assume that because the adoption curve is drawn as a smooth-sided bell, your demand will tail off at the end as gradually as it built up in the beginning. But that isn't how it works. At the start, you are slowly building up momentum from a base of nothing. That takes years. But by the time you saturate the market you have built up huge sales momentum. You have a strong brand, you have advertising, you have a big distribution channel. You'll gulp through the late adopters really rapidly. The result is that sales continue to grow until they drop suddenly, like a sprinter running off the edge of a cliff.
November 29, 2010
Google's high hopes for ChromeOS.
Don't know how to bet on this. Could Google steal the corporate OS market from Microsoft? It's a crazy plan but might it just work? Or is it a pipe-dream?
I still think that the key to unlocking M$'s corporate ownership is the iPad. If the iPad becomes the boss's tool of choice for overseeing the business (corporate dashboard) then we'll see a sudden drop in enthusiasm for Windows. And then ChromeOS (or Linux or anything significantly cheaper than Windows) will turn out to be good enough for the underlings. ChromeOS isn't going to unleash that aspirational energy. Only Apple can.
But there's another joker in the pack : RIM (Blackberry). Could the Playbook be good enough to take that dashboard role instead of the iPad?
What would it take for that to happen?
Don't know how to bet on this. Could Google steal the corporate OS market from Microsoft? It's a crazy plan but might it just work? Or is it a pipe-dream?
I still think that the key to unlocking M$'s corporate ownership is the iPad. If the iPad becomes the boss's tool of choice for overseeing the business (corporate dashboard) then we'll see a sudden drop in enthusiasm for Windows. And then ChromeOS (or Linux or anything significantly cheaper than Windows) will turn out to be good enough for the underlings. ChromeOS isn't going to unleash that aspirational energy. Only Apple can.
But there's another joker in the pack : RIM (Blackberry). Could the Playbook be good enough to take that dashboard role instead of the iPad?
What would it take for that to happen?
Marcadores:
blackberry,
dashboards,
ipad,
post-spreadsheets,
spreadsheets
October 15, 2010
As far as I can see, the only real hope for Microsoft in the smartphone market is to buy RIM (Blackberry).
There is no pure software market in selling mobile operating systems. Just as there wasn't in selling operating systems for web-servers.
As with web-servers, the only os likely to gain traction is one which is effectively free like Android.
Or you make your own handsets.
Buying Blackberry would give M$ a handset manufacturer, a valuable enterprise brand, and the headache of merging its engineers and software with RIM's. Nevertheless, I suspect that the latter is a price worth paying for the first two.
Ideally, forget the "Windows Phone" brand and concentrate on using M$ muscle to promote the Blackberry with enterprises, carriers, retailers etc. Then merge specific interesting new M$ technologies, apps, UI innovations, engineering teams into Blackberry.
Won't happen, of course, as long as the "cult of Windows" remains dominant at M$.
There is no pure software market in selling mobile operating systems. Just as there wasn't in selling operating systems for web-servers.
As with web-servers, the only os likely to gain traction is one which is effectively free like Android.
Or you make your own handsets.
Buying Blackberry would give M$ a handset manufacturer, a valuable enterprise brand, and the headache of merging its engineers and software with RIM's. Nevertheless, I suspect that the latter is a price worth paying for the first two.
Ideally, forget the "Windows Phone" brand and concentrate on using M$ muscle to promote the Blackberry with enterprises, carriers, retailers etc. Then merge specific interesting new M$ technologies, apps, UI innovations, engineering teams into Blackberry.
Won't happen, of course, as long as the "cult of Windows" remains dominant at M$.
Marcadores:
blackberry,
if I ran the zoo,
Microsoft,
phone,
smartphone
October 22, 2008
This is an interesting place : Apple's AppStore now gets rivals from Android Market and RIM's Blackberry Storefront
Presumably the manufacturers will want exclusive control over selling to "their" phone platform. But for their device-swarm-market they'd like to be able to sell apps. for other phones. Who'll break this open?
Update : Who's gonna do this for ordinary PC ie. netbook software?
Presumably the manufacturers will want exclusive control over selling to "their" phone platform. But for their device-swarm-market they'd like to be able to sell apps. for other phones. Who'll break this open?
Update : Who's gonna do this for ordinary PC ie. netbook software?
Marcadores:
android,
android market,
appstore,
blackberry,
blackberry storefront,
device swarm,
iphone,
netbooks,
phone,
rim
January 09, 2008
Tim O'Reilly compares iPhone vs. Blackberry to Excel vs. Lotus 123
Marcadores:
blackberry,
Excel,
iphone,
lotus123,
phone,
user interfaces
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)