tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17469573.post6215417151829081241..comments2023-08-08T09:53:14.113-02:00Comments on Platform Wars: Composinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01739889615635395138noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17469573.post-61866218655502284562007-12-04T07:50:00.000-02:002007-12-04T07:50:00.000-02:00Sounds like the more you try to define abstracted ...Sounds like the more you try to define abstracted concepts digitally, the more trouble you get in. What we have so far (generally speaking) is definitely a hack, AFAICS: everything boils down to 0 OR 1, so you're trying to squeeze an infinity of existence and comprehension into a (false?) dichotomy. Is everything built on top of that (technically speaking) then inherently a hack too?<BR/><BR/>The net works so far because it's fuzzy. Humans are fuzzy. Language is fuzzy. What I mean isn't necessarily how you interpret it, but it does the job, because we're not the same person.<BR/><BR/>There's probably some similarity with the idea of measuring happiness here...Scribehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08757616056135886893noreply@blogger.com